The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self & Soul

The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self & Soul

Category: (Book)

25 new, starting at $14.02

44 used, starting at $4.00

Buy Now

Editorial Reviews

From some of the 20th century's greatest thinkers, essays on topics as diverse as artificial intelligence, evolution, science fiction, philosophy, reductionism, and consciousness With contributions from Jorge Luis Borges, Richard Dawkins, John Searle, and Robert Nozick, The Mind's I explores the meaning of self and consciousness through the perspectives of literature, artificial intelligence, psychology, and other disciplines. In selections that range from fiction to scientific speculations about thinking machines, artificial intelligence, and the nature of the brain, Hofstadter and Dennett present a variety of conflicting visions of the self and the soul as explored through the writings of some of the twentieth century's most renowned thinkers.

Ever wondered who you are? Who you really are? This collection of writings and reflections by some of today's most notable thinkers is designed to enliven this most central, and most baffling, question in the philosophy of mind. In some ways, the questions posed and bantered about in this book are at the heart of all philosophical reasoning. They are the ultimate questions about the self. The Mind's I contains an astonishing variety of approaches to answering the question, "Who am I?" Between the covers of this book one encounters the literary erudition of Argentinean writer Jorge Luis Borges alongside the analytic rigor of John Searle. There are sophisticated metaphorical pieces (such as "The Princess Ineffabelle" by Polish philosopher and writer Stanislaw Lem), intriguing dialogues (like Raymond Smullyan's "Is God a Taoist?"), and serious but engaging philosophical essays from a host of thinkers (see Thomas Nagel's "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?").

Editors Hofstadter and Dennett--leading lights in the study of cognitive science, artificial intelligence, and the philosophy of mind--follow each selection with a short reflection designed to elaborate on their main themes. The Mind's I admirably broadens their fields to a more general audience. The book's essays are grouped into six categories, each successively raising the philosophical stakes by introducing new levels of complexity. Ultimately, one confronts some of the thorniest questions in modern philosophy here, such as the nature of free will, our place in the metaphysical world, and the possibility of genuine artificial intelligence. The book closes with a playful and perplexing piece by Robert Nozick, an adequate summation to The Mind's I. He writes, "Perhaps God has not decided yet whether he has created, in this world, a fictional world or a real one.... Which decision do you hope for?" --Eric de Place

Customer Reviews

Intriguing look

Reviewed by Mike V, 2010-02-06

One of my all time favorite books. This is really a great look at all things "I" am.

Hofstadter's Accustomed Brilliance

Reviewed by Elliott Bignell, 2008-01-24

Hofstadter delivers a vastly enjoyable account accessible to any intelligent non-specialist, but on this occasion requiring far less persistence than Gödel, Escher, Bach. The ground he covers encompasses some of the most traditionally intractable problems in philosophy, yet his accounts of the various thought experiments and the issues they do and do not illuminate never appear impenetrable. The book is organised into a collection of vignettes that can easily be bitten off and chewed over independently. You will, it must be said, probably not come away from a reading with a clear answer as to the nature of the self, the seat and origin of consciousness or whether the Matrix has us. This is no fault of the author's, as some of the questions have never been answered and some of them are intrinsically irresolvable. You'll have a good understanding, though - assuming you do not start with it - of just why they are or are not irresolvable and where philosophy currently stands on them.

A masterpiece of erudition and clarity.

Later edit: I should point out that I only credited Hofstadter, writing some time after I read the book. As I have been reminded in the comment and as I belatedly realised, the credit accrues to multiple contributors.

Old but not outdated

Reviewed by Gijs Leegwater, 2008-01-16

This book is a great collection of stories and essays that makes you think, ask, and wonder. Although i think Dennett is a materialist, this book has many stories challenging it and thereby showing some major problems with consciousness(for example, the identity problem - if someone's body is copied atom for atom and the original destroyed, has anything really been changed?).
It's fun to read, because of the format you'll get through it a lot easier than Consciousness Explained but it still contains lots of insights. It's actually from 1981 and was stored deep down underground in my library's depot(Amsterdam), but almost all of it is still actual.

I am he as you are me

Reviewed by Cecil Bothwell, 2007-11-27

THE MIND'S I is not the seamless tour de force Hofstadter laid out in GODEL, ESCHER, BACH (Vintage Books, 1979), but comprises another delightful exploration of consciousness and in a much more accessible way. Who or what is it that knows what you know you know? You know? You, no? Whaddya no? Etc.

Mine's Aye

Reviewed by JamesDaedalus, 2007-02-21

Look if you're here, then you want this book.

You can't have landed on this page by accident. There is no search that does not include Dennet or Hofstadter or Dawkins or cognitive psychology or philosophy of the mind that brings you hear. So, yes, you want to buy this book.

Two of the most important advents in cognitive and evolutionary psychology take shape rather easily in these pages. The first is Dr Hofstadter PRELUDE... ANT FUGUE; the second is Richard Dawkins extention of genetic principles - to mimetic principles.

If you're new to the term, think "mimetics" is the genetics of "ideas." Why do some slogans survive? Why does some information survive? Why do some idea-conepts - capitalism, pop music, Dora the Explorer - survive in the hive of the Group Mind of society while other ideas - the pet rock, the betamax, the Edsel - die?

Mimetics is the study of the 'survival of the fittest' of ideas. It is the cognitive extension of natural selection.

Second, is meta-yet-unmeta presentation of Hofstadter's PRELUDE... ANT FUGUE. In a subconsciously self-aware narrative (best way to describe it), the story of Anteater and her relationship with an Anthill describes how the cognition and consciousness of the human mind may have arisen from the 'simple' electrical impulses of neurons firing.

The third critical piece of the triumverate of evolutionary cognition (in my opinion) is contained inside Daniel Dennett's book CONSCIOUSNESS EXPLAINED. In that, he describes how external 'orientation events' might unify the random 'reactions' of a primitive organism to its environment, into a *conscious* pattern of response by organism to its external environment.

If you're new to these ideas, this place is a great place to start because - being a collection of essays - it can be read and pondered at a personal pace.

And the commentary provided ain't by no slouches either.

****The only caveat would be if you do have an expansive background in cognitive philosophy or evolutionary psychology - much of this work is reprinted from previous sources. Obviously, Dawkins and Hofstadter's most famous work is taken from their most famous books. However, the commentary and additional selections by the two authors is valuable to any student of this subject.